Four R’s of Effective Evaluation

Credit: iStock.com/akinbostanci
Credit: iStock.com/akinbostanci
Because so much depends upon the evaluation of a student’s learning and the resulting grade, it is in everyone’s interest to try to make the evaluation system as free from irrelevant errors as possible. Borrowing from the evaluation literature, I propose the four R’s of evaluation—Relevant, Reliable, Recognizable, Realistic—as ways to ensure the quality of our evaluation systems.

To continue reading, you must be a Teaching Professor Subscriber. Please log in or sign up for full access.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related Articles

I have two loves: teaching and learning. Although I love them for different reasons, I’ve been passionate about...
In past essays, I’ve covered how students fool themselves into believing they have mastered concepts when they really...
If you use team projects and the grade comes only from you, you’re missing an essential opportunity. Including...
One of the fundamental tenets of higher education is that students should take notes on what their instructor...
Could doodles, sketches, and stick figures help to keep the college reading apocalypse at bay?...
We’ve all faced it: the daunting stack of student work, each submission representing hours of potential grading. The...
Storytelling is one of the most powerful means of communication as it can captivate the audience, improving retention...

Create a free account, or log in.

Gain access to limited free articles, news alerts, and select newsletters

Login here