An Intriguing Participation Policy

I was looking at participation policies in a collection of syllabi this week. I wouldn’t give most of them high marks—lots of vague descriptions that don’t functionally define participation and then prescribe instructor assessment at the end of course with little or no mention of criteria. But I’ve voiced my concerns about participation policies previously, so I won’t do again here. Instead, what I would like to share with you is a policy that’s impressive in its specificity and in the intriguing idea it contains.

To continue reading, you must be a Teaching Professor Subscriber. Please log in or sign up for full access.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related Articles

I have two loves: teaching and learning. Although I love them for different reasons, I’ve been passionate about...
Whether you love it or hate it, online higher education is here to stay. In the 2022–2023 academic...
When educators talk about AI, they seem to fall into one of two camps: one that is vehemently...
Many students struggle with their education due to poor study skills. They wait until the last minute to...
On July 20, 2007, millions of people around the world were filled with a mix of anticipation and...
Most professional program curricula focus on the required specialized knowledge and skills to meet the profession’s needs. Yet...
There are now AI resources to help instructors through all steps of lesson development, from crafting lesson outlines...

Are you signed up for free weekly Teaching Professor updates?

You'll get notified of the newest articles.

The Teaching Professor Conference 2024

June 7-9, 2024 • New Orleans

Connect with Fellow Educators at The Teaching Professor Conference!