The Boring Syllabus

the boring syllabus_2001
The writing style of the standard syllabus is frequently flat, emotionless, and formulaic. It's made so in part by the list of things that faculty are required to put in the syllabus: contact information, learning objectives, course description, ADA and other policy information, etc. These policy guidelines are considered necessary for a variety of good reasons. Even so, I have yet to see a policy on syllabi that demands they bore the reader! Much like first impressions of individuals, the course description in the catalog and the syllabus are the “official” first impressions that a student will have of a course (though many now turn to RateMyProfessors.com for “real” course information). What kind of impression do they make?

To continue reading, you must be a Teaching Professor Subscriber. Please log in or sign up for full access.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related Articles

I have two loves: teaching and learning. Although I love them for different reasons, I’ve been passionate about...
Whether you love it or hate it, online higher education is here to stay. In the 2022–2023 academic...
When educators talk about AI, they seem to fall into one of two camps: one that is vehemently...
Many students struggle with their education due to poor study skills. They wait until the last minute to...
On July 20, 2007, millions of people around the world were filled with a mix of anticipation and...
Most professional program curricula focus on the required specialized knowledge and skills to meet the profession’s needs. Yet...
There are now AI resources to help instructors through all steps of lesson development, from crafting lesson outlines...

Are you signed up for free weekly Teaching Professor updates?

You'll get notified of the newest articles.

The Teaching Professor Conference 2024

June 7-9, 2024 • New Orleans

Connect with Fellow Educators at The Teaching Professor Conference!