Search
Close this search box.

Making Multiple-Choice Exams Better

The relatively new Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology journal has a great feature called a “Teacher-Ready Research Review.” The examples I've read so far are well organized, clearly written, full of practical implications, and well referenced. This one on multiple-choice (m/c) tests (mostly the questions on those tests) is no exception. Given our strong reliance on this test type, a regular review of common practices in light of research is warranted.

To continue reading, you must be a Teaching Professor Subscriber. Please log in or sign up for full access.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related Articles

I have two loves: teaching and learning. Although I love them for different reasons, I’ve been passionate about...
“Are those handouts for us?” my student asked, gesturing toward the copies of Shakespeare’s Sonnet 29 that I’d...
An abundance of literature exists indicating that students are disengaged, unmotivated, and potentially downright bored in classes. Part...
Gamification has been shown to improve student learning (Brull, 2016), and one of the best apps for facilitating...
“When You’re Smiling (The Whole World Smiles with You),” first published in 1928 by Shay, Fischer, and Goodwin,...
I must confess, I’ve always been skeptical about group work. Raised in East Asia, my K–16 education relied...
Computers have made it easier for instructors to use simulations in their teaching. These are usually self-paced and...

Are you signed up for free weekly Teaching Professor updates?

You'll get notified of the newest articles.