Revisiting the Syllabus

revisiting the syllabus_2001
For a variety of reasons, we’re starting this year with a series on the syllabus. Most of us consider it an important course resource. We devote time and energy into its development; it’s frequently the tool we use to plan and revise our courses. But it’s also a taken-for-granted artifact of teaching, and when we’re faced with teaching three, four, even five courses, recycling old syllabi is often the most efficient option. Add the new dates, use that lovely “find and replace” function, and the syllabi are good to go. How long has it been since the last serious syllabus revision? What’s the origin of this current syllabus? What’s the rationale for this set of sections and why do they appear in this order? What’s been added? Changed? Stayed the same?

To continue reading, you must be a Teaching Professor Subscriber. Please log in or sign up for full access.

Related Articles

I’ve been wanting to write about my journey to embrace Rumi’s wisdom in my pedagogy. My teaching career...
We’ve now had ChatGPT in our lives for just over a year, but according to commentators, AI has...
Higher education recognizes the importance of tutoring support to improve student success and retention. But human tutoring is...

The first summer job I ever had was mowing lawns. Back then (this was the ’70s), I would...

Current global events, including a rise in nationalistic rhetoric, have put pressure on faculty from all disciplines to...

Many years ago my wife sat in on one of my face-to-face classes to observe my teaching. I...
The Teaching Professor Conference 2024

June 7-9, 2024 • New Orleans

Connect with Fellow Educators at The Teaching Professor Conference!