Search
Close this search box.

Online Learning 2.0: The Teaching Toolbox

Online instructors focus most of their teaching on curricular issues—what they will teach, how they will teach it, etc. But studies have found that differences in curriculum have little, if any, effect on student outcomes. John Hattie compared more than 100 factors related to student achievement from more than 180,000 studies and ranked the factors from most significant to least significant. Remarkably, “Programmed Instruction” came out at the bottom. While faculty toil over getting that perfect lecture, the variation in learning outcomes from different lectures is negligible. So what did matter? Feedback.

To continue reading, you must be a Teaching Professor Subscriber. Please log in or sign up for full access.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Related Articles

I have two loves: teaching and learning. Although I love them for different reasons, I’ve been passionate about...
“Are those handouts for us?” my student asked, gesturing toward the copies of Shakespeare’s Sonnet 29 that I’d...
An abundance of literature exists indicating that students are disengaged, unmotivated, and potentially downright bored in classes. Part...
Gamification has been shown to improve student learning (Brull, 2016), and one of the best apps for facilitating...
“When You’re Smiling (The Whole World Smiles with You),” first published in 1928 by Shay, Fischer, and Goodwin,...
I must confess, I’ve always been skeptical about group work. Raised in East Asia, my K–16 education relied...
Computers have made it easier for instructors to use simulations in their teaching. These are usually self-paced and...

Are you signed up for free weekly Teaching Professor updates?

You'll get notified of the newest articles.