Search
Close this search box.

Grading Practices: More Subjective than Objective?

Grading and feedback
A recent survey of 175 economics professors who teach basic principles of economics courses revealed a widely diverse set of grading practices for the course. These instructors taught at 118 different institutions, including doctoral degree-granting universities, two-year colleges, and everything in between. The findings are specific to the course and the field of economics. However, the questions raised by the analysis are relevant to grading across the board. The different grading policies and practices reported here are not uncommon, and one would suspect that findings like these are typical of any number of courses routinely offered by our institutions.

To continue reading, you must be a Teaching Professor Subscriber. Please log in or sign up for full access.

Related Articles

I have two loves: teaching and learning. Although I love them for different reasons, I’ve been passionate about...
I’ve often felt that a teacher’s life is suspended, Janus-like, between past experiences and future hopes; it’s only...
I teach first-year writing at a small liberal arts college, and on the first day of class, I...
Proponents of rubrics champion them as a means of ensuring consistency in grading, not only between students within...
Like New Year’s Day, new academic semesters start with effervescent promise. Students and instructors recalibrate their sleep and...
The start of a new semester is an emotional experience. As a former kindergarten teacher, I vividly remember...
The allure of the copy-and-paste approach to course design is ever present. Many of us, out of what...

Are you signed up for free weekly Teaching Professor updates?

You'll get notified of the newest articles.