Several years into my 30-year career as a professor, I had an experience that ultimately upended my entire approach to teaching. I came to see the conventional classroom in a whole new way—as a sensory ...
The learning management system (LMS) discussion forum comes off as archaic and overly controlling to today’s students, who are used to working in a much richer social media environment. Whereas the LMS forum is designed ...
“How do I fill up four hours a week of class time?” At first, this exclamation from a first-year graduate student preparing to teach her first class seemed alien to my experienced teacher mindset. Perhaps ...
When my son was growing up, my wife and I bought memberships at the local science museum so we could take him there any time we wanted. Like many parents, we wanted him to grow ...
While animation used to be the purview of professional studios, today software like Vyond makes it easy for those with no animation skills at all. I design and teach an online college-readiness course that includes ...
Studies have demonstrated not only a strong correlation between student time devoted to academics and success but also that students spend less time studying than ever before (Brint & Cantwell, 2010). This is a problem ...
Field trips are often a school-year highlight for students. You may have fond memories of the enthusiasm created by a trip to your local fire department or zoo when you were young. You were thrilled ...
Most academic courses require learners to do some amount of reading to provide background in core concepts, to demonstrate applications and use cases, and to elaborate intriguing new applications and directions—or maybe just to navigate ...
Connectedness and relationships are important for students’ learning experiences. But online instructors may be tempted to think it is too challenging to fully engage all of their students. How can instructors whet their students’ appetites ...
Student engagement—Could it be the most common phrase in the teaching-learning domains of higher education? It’s has to be in the running—essential for learning with unquestioned importance and dutifully intoned by everyone. I was intrigued ...
Several years into my 30-year career as a professor, I had an experience that ultimately upended my entire approach to teaching. I came to see the conventional classroom in a whole new way—as a sensory deprivation chamber—and developed a hands-on antidote I call “thinking with things.”
As is true for so many good ideas, this one began with a failure. I was a harried assistant professor with two young children at home, teaching a course on sustainable development for which there was no textbook. In those days before everything went online, I was handing out photocopied readings a week or more before the assignment was due. But on this day, as I pulled into the parking lot, I realized that I had forgotten to distribute the article for that day’s class. It can be hard enough to spark a class discussion of an assigned reading under the best of circumstances, but on this day I knew that no one could have done the reading. Casting around desperately for an alternative, I spotted the tub of Lego in the back of my car (doesn’t every parent of young children have Lego in their car?). I’d been curious about what would happen if I brought physical materials into my classroom and decided on that day that I really had nothing to lose.
In class, my students gathered around a table as I asked them to work individually to “sketch a sustainable community” with the Lego bricks. I wasn’t asking them to construct buildings but to use individual bricks to suggest particular features—like a public library, train station, housing, or senior center—of a neighborhood plan. I gave them about five minutes to arrange their communities. As they worked they were engaged but also chatting happily. Then we went around the table and each student told all of us what they had built. The look in their eyes told me that they had found the exercise fun and engaging, but the results of their building told me that they had retained nothing from the readings we had done and the film on suburban sprawl that we had watched. I gave the group feedback on what I found missing from their constructions then asked them to work together to revise the neighborhoods on the table, joining them with infrastructure that would be more sustainable. Five minutes later, the tabletop town was significantly improved.
I’ve never forgotten that first day with physical materials in my social science classroom. The fun and engagement were palpable, and every student participated and spoke. Also unforgettable was the clear indication that my students had not absorbed the lessons I was trying to teach.
Since that day, the vast majority of my class sessions have some active, tactile element. Developing these brief in-class exercises has often been challenging but well worth the reward. I teach design thinking by having students use pipe cleaners to design a perfect homework setting or modeling clay to propose pop-up shelters for the homeless. I offer sticky notes, collage materials, and flip chart paper and ask students to work in pairs to create a poster that educates others about a topic that interests them. For longer projects, a colleague and I have given students simple robotics materials and asked them to create a concept prototype of a device that promotes sustainability. Once I started thinking about the material culture of the classroom, so many ideas presented themselves. And the student feedback was overwhelmingly positive, which made the effort more than worth it. It made the classroom fun and surprising for me too.
In time, I became determined to understand some of the foundations of this instructional alchemy. I learned about the research showing that we think with our hands, our bodies, and our immediate environments, not just with the contents of our skulls. So-called embodied cognition points to all the knowledge and skills we have—the know-how—that can’t necessarily be expressed in words (the “know-what”).
When we engage students’ hands and bodies in exploration and construction, we are teaching the way human beings really learn. A thinking with things approach to teaching has many compelling advantages:
What stands in the way of making the change to a thinking with things classroom?
In my workshops for faculty, I have each participant identify a teaching challenge they would like to address. Some select concepts that are particularly difficult for students. Others focus on process issues like increasing active participation, building teamwork, or icebreaker exercises for the first class meeting. I have yet to find a topic that is not in some way amenable to a thinking with things approach.
Every academic discipline is different, with its own fundamental concepts and its own culture, so your implementation of thinking with things in the classroom will depend on your subject. But here are some examples of how you might use this approach in your teaching.
This list is just the start of what you can accomplish when bringing a thinking with things approach to your classroom. While it’s work to plan and set up for this method of teaching, I think you will find that your effort is more than rewarded with the increased student engagement, positive affect, and deeper learning that is possible. If you’re like me, you too may feel revitalized.
Kristiansen, P., & Rasmussen, R. (2014). Building a better business using the Lego serious play method. John Wiley & Sons.
Kuhn, S. (2021). Transforming learning through tangible instruction: The case for thinking with things. Routledge.
Kuhn, S., & Davidson, J. (2007). Thinking with things, teaching with things: Enhancing student learning in qualitative research through reflective use of tools and materials. Qualitative Research Journal, 7(2), 63–75. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0702063
Sarah Kuhn, PhD, is professor emerita of psychology at the University of Massachusetts Lowell and the author of Transforming Learning through Tangible Instruction: The Case for Thinking with Things (Routledge, 2021). She is eager to hear from faculty interested in exploring a thinking with things approach and can be found at https://www.thinkingwiththings.com.