Teaching & Learning Award
Thank you for your interest in the Maryellen Weimer Scholarly Work on Teaching and Learning Award, an annual award that recognizes outstanding scholarly contributions with the potential to advance college-level teaching and learning practices. The 2014 Call for Nominations is now closed.
Author(s) of the winning article will be recognized at the 2014 Teaching Professor Conference, May 30-June 1, 2014 in Boston, Massachusetts. The award includes a $1,000 stipend.
- Articles are blind reviewed by a panel, including published authors, editors, and faculty familiar with the pedagogical literature.
- Potential to positively impact the instructional practice of the college teaching community
- Depth of scholarly insight (relevant research question, detailed analysis, provocative, reflective)
- Well-grounded in relevant pedagogical literature
- Appropriate method of analysis (be it quantitative, qualitative or reflective practice)
- Well written, easy to read, engaging, well organized, succinct
- Extends research findings and current notions of best instructional practices
- A $1,000 stipend given to the author, or shared if there are multiple authors
- Award made at the 2014 Teaching Professor Conference in Boston.
- Dissemination of the winning scholarship at The Teaching Professor Conference, in The Teaching Professor newsletter, The Teaching Professor Blog and beyond
For additional information, contact: MaryAnn Mlekush via email email@example.com or phone: 608-227-8138.
Past Maryellen Weimer Scholarly Work
on Teaching and Learning Award Winners
Ohland, M. W., Loughry, M. L., Woehr, D. J., Bullard, L. G., Felder, R. M., Finelli, C. J., Layton, R. A., Pomeranz, H. R., & Schmucker, D. G. (2012). The comprehensive assessment of team member effectiveness: Development of a behaviorally anchored rating scale for self- and peer evaluation. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11 (4): 609-630.
2013 Finalists, listed in alphabetical order
Green, K. R., Pinder-Grover, T., and Millunchick, J. M. (2012). Impact of screencast technology: Connecting the perception of usefulness and the reality of performance. Journal of Engineering Education, 101 (4), 717-737.
Premuroso, R. F., Tong, L., and Beed, T. K. (2011). Does using clickers in the classroom matter to student performance and satisfaction when taking the introductory financial account course? Issues in Accounting Education, 26 (4), 701-723.
Shields, S. P., Hogrebe, M. C., Spees, W. M., Handlin, L. B., Noelken, G. P., Riley, J. M., and Frey, R. F. (2012). A transition program for underprepared students in general chemistry: Diagnosis, implementation and evaluation. Journal of Chemical Education, 89 (8), 995-1000.
Sipress, J. M. and Voelker, D. J. (2011). The end of the history survey course: the rise and fall of the coverage model. Journal of American History, 97 (4), 1050-1066.
2012 Finalists, listed in alphabetical order
Hauhart, R. C. and Grahe, J. E. (2010). The undergraduate capstone course in the social sciences: results from regional survey. Teaching Sociology, 38 (1), 4-17.
Pike, D. (2011). The tyranny of dead ideas in teaching and learning: Midwest Sociological Society Presidential Address 2010. The Sociological Quarterly, 52, 1-12.
Winning article (a two part article)
Beatty, J. E., Leigh, J. S. A., and Dean, K. L., (2009). Philosophy rediscovered: Exploring the connections between teaching philosophies, educational philosophies, and philosophy. Journal of Management Education, 33 (1), 99-114. Find the article at: http://jme.sagepub.com/content/33/1/99.full.pdf+html
Beatty, J. E., Leigh, J. S. A., and Dean, K. L., (2009). Finding our roots: An exercise for creating a personal teaching philosophy statement. Journal of Management Education, 33 (1), 115-130. Find the article at: http://jme.sagepub.com/content/33/1/115.full.pdf+html
2011 Finalists, listed in alphabetical order
Dunlap, J. C. and Lowenthal, P. R. (2009). Tweeting the night away: Using Twitter to enhance social presence. Journal of Information Systems Education, 20 (2), 129-130. Find the article at: http://jise.org/20-2-129.htm
Sum, P. E. and Light, S. A. (2010). Assessing student learning outcomes and documenting success through a capstone course. PS: Political Science and Politics, 43 (3), 523-31. Find the article at: https://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayIssue?decade=2010&jid=PSC&volumeId=43&issueId=03&iid=7819612
Carrithers, D., Ling, T., and Bean, J. C. (2008). Messy problems and lay audiences:
Teaching critical thinking within the finance curriculum. Business Communication Quarterly, 71 (2), 152-170.
Find the article at: http://bcq.sagepub.com/
2010 Finalists, listed in alphabetical order
Kraemer, E. W., Lombardo, S. V., and Lepkowski, F. J. (2007). The librarian, the machine, or a little of both: A comparative study of three information literacy pedagogies at Oakland University. College & Research Libraries, 68 (4), 330-342.
Find the article at http://crl.acrl.org/content/68/4/330.full.pdf+html.
Pollard, E. A. (2008). Raising the stakes: Writing about witchcraft on wikipedia. The History Teacher, 42 (1), 9-24.
Find the article at http://www.historycooperative.org/journals/ht/42.1/pollard.html.
Diaz, A., J., Middendorf, J., Pace, D., and Shopkow, L. (2008). The history learning project: A department decodes its students. Journal of American History, 94 (4), 1211-1224.
2009 Finalists, listed in alphabetical order
Hawk, T. F., and Lyons, P. R. (2008). Please don’t give up on me: When faculty fail to care. Journal of Management Education, 32 (3), 316-338.
Hayes-Bohanan, P., and Spievak, E. (2008). You can lead students to sources, but can you make them think? Journal of College and Undergraduate Libraries, 15 (1-2), 173-210.
Lerner, N., Craig, J., and Poe, M. (2008). Innovation across the curriculum: Three case studies in teaching science and engineering communication. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 51 (3), 280-301.
Prince, M. J., Felder, R. M., and Brent, R. (2007). Does faculty research improve undergraduate teaching? An analysis of existing and potential synergies. Journal of Engineering Education, 96 (4), 283-294.