<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Office Hours and Participation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.teachingprofessor.com/articles/class-policies/office-hours-and-participation/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.teachingprofessor.com/articles/class-policies/office-hours-and-participation</link>
	<description>A teaching and learning conference.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 15:28:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janet Branchaw</title>
		<link>http://www.teachingprofessor.com/articles/class-policies/office-hours-and-participation/comment-page-1#comment-4576</link>
		<dc:creator>Janet Branchaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 16:26:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.teachingprofessor.com/?p=1555#comment-4576</guid>
		<description>Though I like this idea in theory, I envision students coming to my office hours simply to earn points, with nothing substantial to discuss or contribute. I teach pre-professional students, who are very grade driven.

In addition, it seems one would have to develop a policy regarding what counts and what does not count for points. Would this defeat the purpose? Would the conversations become contrived, rather than genuine? I would feel like I&#039;m constantly judging what the students are saying, rather than simply getting to know them and discussing the material.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though I like this idea in theory, I envision students coming to my office hours simply to earn points, with nothing substantial to discuss or contribute. I teach pre-professional students, who are very grade driven.</p>
<p>In addition, it seems one would have to develop a policy regarding what counts and what does not count for points. Would this defeat the purpose? Would the conversations become contrived, rather than genuine? I would feel like I&#8217;m constantly judging what the students are saying, rather than simply getting to know them and discussing the material.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

